Catherine Ashton, had “a perfect opportunity to protest against China’s brazen stance on the Nobel Prize”, observes Dagens Nyheter. Had she attended the awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize to dissident Liu Xiaobo on 10 December in Oslo, the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs could have demonstrated that “Europe won’t acquiesce as the Chinese regime seeks to gag human rights defenders”.
Brussels’ excuse is that Catherine Ashton was not invited, but the Swedish paper won’t buy it: “The only thing that kept her from going to Norway was her desire to please the greatest number.” “The message is plain”, observes Dagens Nyheter: “her showing up at Oslo’s town hall would have put a serious dent in relations with China.” Representatives of all EU member states were there at the ceremony, to be sure, but she should have been there too: “In her capacity as European diplomacy chief, Catherine Ashton could easily have joined the group and shed her usual excess of caution to stand up for the rights of Liu Xiaobo. If the EU itself won’t defend the values that unite it, how can states do so in their dealings with the world’s premier dictatorship?”
The leader of Greece’s leftist alliance SYRIZA is the new bright hope of Greek politics. Steering a course between pragmatism and the rhetoric of class warfare, he has unsettled Berlin, and not just those who back Angela Merkel's austerity policies.
Europe’s economic woes have forced us to try to understand the secret Olympian world of global finance. But now that we pay more attention to bond yields and stability mechanisms, isn’t it clear that the experts up on their lofty peaks don’t know what’s going on either?
This year’s Eurovision Song Contest is hosted by Azerbaijan, a country that is far from being a model democracy. An Estonian journalist takes a critical look at the deferential treatment enjoyed by the regime in Baku.