Member States

Netherlands

Wilders’ imaginary Eurabia

04 March 2010 Mladá Fronta DNES Prague
Europe's future, according to Wilders. Photo : Frans Lemmens

Europe's future, according to Wilders. Photo : Frans Lemmens

Frans Lemmens

Brandishing the spectre of "the threat of Islam," populist leader Geert Wilders obtained a breakthrough in the 3 March local elections, which will constitute a major step forward in his campaign to become prime minister. For Czech daily Mladá Fronta Dnes, Muslims are not a real threat to multicultural Dutch society: the main danger is the manner in which the majority of the population intends to live with them.

If Geert Wilders succeeds in obtaining the post of prime minister in the June general elections, for the first time ever an EU state will be governed by a man who believes in the existence of Eurabia — a mythological future continent that will replace modern Europe, where children from Norway to Naples will learn to recite the Koran at school, while their mothers stay at home wearing burqas.

Two years ago, the leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV) gave a speech in which he argued that Dutch Muslims should be given money to leave the country: "Take a walk down the street and see where this is going. You no longer feel like you are living in your own country. There is a battle going on and we have to defend ourselves. Before you know it there will be more mosques than churches!" This is the type of rhetoric that has enabled Wilders to win more votes, because millions of his fellow citizens share his sense of being threatened by a foreign culture.

Obscure ideological delusion

Wilders presents himself as an ardent defender of freedom of speech and, at least on this point, he is not exaggerating. He is currently facing charges of incitement to racial hatred and discrimination, which relate to his comparison of the Koran with Hitler's Mein Kampf

Close to 40% of the Dutch people support the hearing of the case. However, at the same time there has been a massive upsurge in the the PVV leader's popularity. Wilder's reasoning may be incoherent, but the votes are pouring in. And little by little, Eurabia, which started out as an obscure ideological delusion, is becoming a key campaign issue.

Muslim frustration

In their speeches, which insist on the imminence of a demographic explosion and the dangers of jihad, Wilders and his entourage aim to give the impression that they have perfect knowledge of the nature of future society.

However, serious research tends to paint a different picture. In particular it shows that most Muslims experience a sense of frustration, prompted by social marginalization and having to make do with very low incomes. No doubt this is why they are more than surprised by the claim that they represent a powerful force that is seeking to take over the continent of Europe.

On the contrary, they are willing to accept assimilation and the concomitant adoption of a foreign non-Islamic identity. But for that to happen, they have to obtain secure and well-paid employment. And the process of integrating Muslims in Europe remains very slow moving. In fact, what currently passes for multicultural society might better be termed a system of ghettoisation. Strictly speaking, Muslims pose no real threat. What is dangerous is the manner in which the white majority intends to live with them. And that is also why the insulting of Islam should be a matter for the courts.

Your comments

 
2 comments
 
 
 

OzDeist
10.04.2010 | 08h49

That is typical of the left: to blame the European citizens for not "accepting" Muslims and their behavior.

Where on Earth does your "serious research" come from? How about this for research: In a poll of 1000 British Muslims, 1/3 believe in an imposition of Sharia Law; 3/4 Muslims believe in restrictions on freedom of speech; and most disturbingly, 1/4 Muslims believe that terrorist violence is somehow justified (the poll was conducted by Gfk NOP Social Research, 7 August 2006). So who exactly is having trouble integrating?

Under no circumstances should criticizing ideas be a legal matter. As soon as we're prohibited from criticizing Muhammad, we can no longer reject his many atrocities as the accepted behavior it is among Muslims. For instance, the fact that Muhammad's favorite wife was 9 at the age of consummation, ensures that the practice of child marriage is widespread in the Muslim world, something that should have been left behind in the Middle Ages!

Henk Luf
30.05.2010 | 10h49

What Geert Wilders should perhaps be concentrating is the fact that thousands of Dutch-born people have been casted off like dirt by the Balkenende Government and the likes of Rita Verdonk as no longer being Dutch. These people emigrated to places such Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the US during 1950's and 1960' and, upon applying for a Dutch passport, were then told that they were no longer regarded as being Dutch citizens. Those who never applied for citizenship in their resident countries can now be regarded as being 'stateless'. So before Wilders goes chasing the 'Dutch being Dutch' vote, he might like to chase up a few hundred thousand Dutch people living in third countries and stand up for their rights as Dutch citizens. In fact, in terms of international and EU legislative terms, the upcoming Dutch may well be deemed invalid as thousands of Dutch citizens living overseas have been denied their vote.

Latest articles published